Government Contracts MonitorGAO DecisionsIt’s Not Over Until It’s Over: Extending Solicitation DeadlinesNovember 29, 2016 As experienced government contractors well know, submitting a proposal after a solicitation has closed is a bad idea. One of the first lessons contractors, and agency personnel, learn is that “late is late,” period. GAO has consistently and repeatedly reinforced this tenet. The Agency, however, does have latitude in adjusting a due date. This often occurs when a solicitation is amended or… Even for a Fixed Price Contract, Valid Price Realism Analysis Requires Logical ReasoningNovember 15, 2016 The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) generally does not require a price realism analysis in the context of a fixed price contract. Instead, the agency is merely required to determine that the offered price is fair and reasonable (i.e. not too high). However, if the government exercises its discretion to conduct a price realism analysis (to evaluate whether the proposed prices are too low),… A Tale Of Two Protests: Cost Claims at the GAOOctober 11, 2016 Two recent decisions highlight the importance of the record to GAO’s consideration of claims for protest costs where the agency takes corrective action before GAO issues a decision. In such circumstances, a protestor can prevail on its cost claim if the agency’s corrective action is unduly delayed and the protestor’s claim is “clearly meritorious.” But the consideration of a protest’s merit is… When a Solicitation is Cancelled, Should an Offeror Protest?September 27, 2016 Given the high cost of preparing a proposal in response to a government solicitation, an agency’s cancellation of a procurement can be both frustrating and disappointing. However, as the recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) opinion in Medfinity LLC, B-413450 (September 9, 2016) makes clear, it is exceedingly difficult to prevail on a protest challenging an agency’s decision to cancel a… When an Offeror and the Government Both Overlook a Material Requirement, There’s Still Hope for an Unsuccessful OfferorSeptember 19, 2016 Task orders issued off ID/IQ contracts, like all government contract awards, must materially comply with the terms of the task order solicitation. The “material” terms of a solicitation are those terms affecting the “price, quantity, quality, or delivery of the goods or services.” Additionally, sometimes the terms of the underlying contract can be relied upon by a protestor to make its case that… The Entity May Exist, but Is It Approved? The Complex World of Joint Ventures and 8(a) AwardsAugust 30, 2016 The 8(a) set-aside program of the Small Business Administration (SBA) provides small businesses with contracting opportunities that might otherwise be far beyond their reach. An 8(a) award is ultimately between the agency and the SBA, with the successful offeror acting as a subcontractor to the SBA and performing the contractor. Significantly, the program allows 8(a) entities to combine resources… If You Want Extra Credit, Ask In Advance: Threshold Goals vs. Comparative RatingsAugust 23, 2016 Before a contractor offers more than the solicitation requires, it should first confirm that it will receive credit for going above and beyond. This is particularly true where the solicitation lays out a clear evaluation scheme and identifies certain evaluation factors as threshold criteria rather than factors to be rated comparatively, with more credit given for exceeding requirements. As the… Suspicions Alone Are Not Enough for an OCI at GAOAugust 8, 2016 As government contractors gain experience and develop their skills, they often reap the hoped-for reward: more contracts. But when success comes in the form of future awards, contractors (and the agencies with which they consistently do business) must always be on the lookout for potential organizational conflicts of interest (OCI). Determining whether an OCI exists can be a tricky endeavor, as… Reasonable and Related to the Evaluation Criteria: Beyond Checking the Boxes in A&E ProposalsAugust 1, 2016 After an unsuccessful bid, disappointed bidders sometimes present hyper-technical protests in a passionate, yet misplaced, attempt to protect their economic interests. Many of these protests ignore the wide discretion GAO gives to agencies in their evaluation pf proposals, and ultimate selection of an awardee. Bidders on Architecture and Engineering (A&E) contracts must be particularly aware that… Sometimes the Facts Revealed During a Protest Demonstrate a Lack of Government “Monkey Business”June 21, 2016 Disappointed bidders always have to decide whether or not to protest based on a limited set of facts – those known at the time to decision is made. Of course, this means that even protest grounds that appear objectively sound at the time of protest can later be undercut by facts revealed during the protest process. This appears to be precisely what happened in the recent Government Accountability… Don’t Get Eliminated on a Technicality - But Don’t Play Games in an Attempt to Meet Solicitation RequirementsJune 12, 2016 A recent decision by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) illustrates the importance of properly meeting a solicitation’s requirements in full, to include page limits and font sizes. While these may seem like insignificant details, failure to follow the instructions to the letter can mean the difference between a proposal being evaluated on its technical merits and being eliminated from… Rule of Thumb: Treat All RFP Amendments as MaterialMay 23, 2016 It has been suggested that “proper planning prevents poor performance.” While that may not always be the case, the statement does provide a pleasantly alliterative reminder that establishing procedures generally does help minimize mistakes. In the context of proposal preparation, one mistake contractors should try to avoid is failing to acknowledge amendments to the solicitation. The recent… |
|
© 2024 Jackson Kelly PLLC. All Rights Reserved.